Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Martin Damm vs Peter Bertran Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Damm vs Bertran analysis and find out who is favored!
Martin Damm vs Peter Bertran Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Damm 1 - 0 Bertran
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Damm has won 48.43% of points on their second serve, while Bertran has won 45.93%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Damm, in recent form, has won 45.41% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bertran has won 51.79%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.31% and 36.25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Damm has saved 70.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bertran has saved 54.17% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Damm has won 64.47% of matches played (W/L 49/ 27), with Bertran winning 53.49% (W/L 23/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Damm has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 63/ 40), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 42/ 41). Bertran has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 78/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Damm has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 28/ 20), where as Bertran has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.41% of matches (W/L 22/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Damm winning 1 times and Bertran being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Damm winning 2 and Bertran winning 0. The last match between Damm and Bertran was at the M25 Santo Domingo, 18-06-2022, Semifinals, Hard with Martin Damm getting the victory 7-6(8) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:7:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Damm and Bertran have played a deciding set 0 times, with Damm winning 0 times and Bertran 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Damm winning 1, and Bertran 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Damm has played against opponents with an average rank of 264.03 while Bertran has played against players with an average rank of 153.21.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Damm has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bertran has won 79% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Damm has converted 33.82% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bertran has converted 53.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
179
Rank
175
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
676
Rank
540
High
28
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
57% (135-103)
Career Total W/L
54% (142-120)
52% (14-13)
YTD W/L
45% (9-11)
$107,985
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Martin Damm | Peter Bertran |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:7:0 | 2:7:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (44/72) | 57% (48/84) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (34/44) | 63% (30/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (12/28) | 47% (17/36) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (37/84) | 36% (26/72) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(8) 6-3 |
Stats 
Martin Damm
Player
Peter Bertran
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Martin Damm | Peter Bertran |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (14/13) | 45% (9/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (31/33) | 43% (20/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (333/340) | 48% (209/228) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 50% (4/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 17% (1/5) | 42% (5/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 1.11 | 0.14 |
| Aces Total | 365 | 29 |
| DFs per game | 0.37 | 0.47 |
| DFs Total | 121 | 100 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:46 | 1:58:39 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 325.7 | 218 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1283/2175) | 60% (890/1480) |
| 1st Serve W% | 77% (992/1283) | 61% (546/890) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (432/892) | 46% (271/590) |
| BPs Won% Total | 34% (46/136) | 53% (70/131) |
| Return Pts W% | 33% (688/2078) | 42% (579/1382) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 55% (11/9) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (9/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (13/26) | 45% (9/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 48% (10/21) | 38% (3/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 64% (7/11) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (15/3) | 17% (12/2) |
Martin Damm Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Martin Damm
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
9
Aces
19
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
25 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
96
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Martin Damm
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
5
Aces
9
9
Double Faults
8
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
43 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Martin Damm
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
51%
(
55 of
107)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
17
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
3
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
52%
(
27 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
37 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Martin Damm
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
9
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
7
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Martin Damm
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
13
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Tommy Paul
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
43
Total Points Won
43
|
4-6 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Zhizhen Zhang
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
87)
14
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(2) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Martin Damm
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
13
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
23 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Peter Bertran Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aryan Shah
Player
Peter Bertran
68%
(
76 of
111)
1st Serve %
63%
(
82 of
131)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
12
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
51 of
82)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
44 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
61 of
131)
128
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Peter Bertran
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Peter Bertran
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peter Bertran
Player
Ivan Denisov
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Bertran
Player
Ryan Augusto dos Santos
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
51
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miguel Tobon
Player
Peter Bertran
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
48%
(
40 of
84)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
34 of
40)
81%
(
26 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
17 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
24 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(5) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Peter Bertran
63%
(
73 of
115)
1st Serve %
55%
(
60 of
109)
2
Aces
6
8
Double Faults
8
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
51 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(9) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Bautista Torres
Player
Peter Bertran
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
9
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Peter Bertran
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Bertran
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Damm Vs Bertran Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
